Wednesday, August 17, 2022
HomeHealthGrowing for FedRAMP Pays Again

Growing for FedRAMP Pays Again


Getting an software or service safety licensed underneath FedRAMP – the Federal Threat and Authorization Administration Program – is likely one of the hardest hurdles dev and ops groups can clear.

It’s so exhausting, that of all of the enterprise providers that exist on the planet, solely 276 are FedRAMP licensed. However these are the apps that the U.S. authorities companies (just like the Departments of Justice, Commerce, and Training, and even some Division of Protection companies) can use, so constructing an app to this customary may be profitable. The U.S. Authorities is usually a precious buyer.

It’s tough to keep up FedRAMP compliance when constructing a SaaS product, however making a DevOps course of in your dev and SRE (ops) groups collectively that permits them to stretch to FedRAMP may be value it. Sustaining FedRAMP compliance means creating merchandise with the very best safety specs. The safety requirements of FedRAMP additionally embody different strong safety requirements from NIST (Nationwide Institute of Requirements and Know-how) and FISMA (Federal Info Safety Modernization).

A handful of Cisco merchandise meet FedRAMP necessities and are listed within the FedRAMP catalog: Cisco WebEx, Cisco WebEx for Authorities, Cisco Unified Communications Supervisor Cloud for Authorities (Cisco UCM Cloud for Authorities), and Cisco Cloud Lock for Authorities. Different merchandise are within the audit course of.

To get a way of what it takes to satisfy the FedRAMP customary and the advantages and alternatives that come from incomes a FedRAMP ATO (Authorization to Function), I sat down with Charles Randall, a former teammate of mine and a safety knowledgeable at Cisco:

What was the most important problem your operations workforce wanted to satisfy with FedRAMP?

Charles Randall: Our largest problem was container vulnerability remediation, which was solely added to scope by the FedRAMP administration workplace the month our audit was scheduled. It was an unlimited change that pulled numerous open supply initiatives into scope, and even required some architectural adjustments. We’re nonetheless struggling to take care of the implications as we speak.

How would you describe the distinction in your software and operations safety posture earlier than and after beginning the FedRAMP certification course of?

CR: We began with a strong software safety posture; adequate to cross ISO 27001/17 and SOC 2 requirements. FedRAMP calls for a considerably increased stage of operational safety, each technically and procedurally. Most of the safety enhancements we made to attain FedRAMP compliance have been utilized to our industrial operations environments as properly, guaranteeing world-class safety for our clients and constant processes and procedures throughout groups.

What are the important thing parts needed for sustaining a strong ongoing monitoring technique? Would these methods make sense in a non-FedRAMP context?

CR: The important thing parts of a strong monitoring program are completeness of imaginative and prescient and a strong set of KPIs. Completeness of imaginative and prescient contains full compliance and vulnerability scanning throughout your whole asset stock, in addition to monitoring of software, system and community actions with a concentrate on anomaly detection. These methods additionally make sense in non-FedRAMP context and have been practically universally utilized to our industrial working environments.

Do you employ off-the-shelf instruments to distinguish a safety occasion from a safety incident? Would you employ these instruments and method if qualifying for FedRAMP wasn’t the target?

CR: We’re primarily utilizing free open supply software program for safety occasion administration, complimented by the complete suite of AWS safety providers. Whereas we do anticipate rising adoption of machine studying, there may be actually no substitute for the experience of operators and analysts with eyes on logs, constantly refining monitoring to attain the very best potential sign to noise ratio. That is one other case the place we use the identical tooling throughout FedRAMP and non-FedRAMP environments, as a result of it permits us to re-use the FedRAMP work in our industrial environments, and keep consistency between working environments.

How do FedRAMP necessities have an effect on software builders? Does their safety posture enhance as a part of the audit course of?

CR: FedRAMP necessities have an unlimited affect on software improvement, in any respect ranges. Each determination, from system structure, to third-party part choice, all the best way right down to your alternative of cryptographic ciphers, can have vital penalties whereas pursuing or sustaining FedRAMP authorization. Past technical choices, FedRAMP controls additionally require mature software program improvement processes and configuration administration practices, with many necessities extending all the best way to construct/deploy pipeline and developer laptops.

What are the implications of builders not adopting safety finest practices early within the worth stream (as a part of their each day work)?

Failing to undertake safety finest practices early in your product improvement cycle, or failing to combine these practices into each day routines, could possibly be disastrous, no matter whether or not your group is making an attempt to pursue FedRAMP authorization. It’s well-known that the price of fixing software program defects may be an order of magnitude increased or extra in manufacturing versus improvement part of the SDLC. Whereas that’s painful sufficient, whenever you issue within the potential prices of larger-scale redesigns that could be required attributable to safety defects, the prices of safety incidents, and the doubtless catastrophic prices of a safety breach, the selection turns into clear that addressing safety calls for early and integrating it into everybody’s each day routine is the best choice. If that argument nonetheless just isn’t sufficient to steer you, contemplate that person information privateness rules at the moment are more and more enforced, and sometimes with huge fines.

What would you advocate for builders who’re new to safe coding and want to stand up to hurry with finest practices. Would you advocate coaching? Studying and adopting safety particular instruments?

The entire above. Safe coding is simply….. coding.


Now learn:


We’d love to listen to what you suppose. Ask a query or go away a remark beneath.
And keep related with Cisco DevNet on social!

LinkedIn | Twitter @CiscoDevNet | Fb | YouTube Channel





Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments